The New Zealand Claim of Right
John Key, the man acting as the Prime Minister for New Zealand;
Christopher Finlayson, the man acting as Attorney General for New Zealand;
David Collins, the man acting as Solicitor General for New Zealand;
Pieri Munro, the man acting as Wellington Chief of Police;
Dear Madams and Sirs:
I am serving herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and my Claim of Right and my Notice of Denial of Consent for your understanding.
You will find the enclosed intact and complete, for now.
Yours truly,
John-Henry :Doe,
Freeman-on-the-Land
Affidavit - Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
I, a flesh and blood living soul commonly known as John-Henry of the Doe family, living on a geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, having no corporate status, do hereby state under oath that the following is my Truth and my Law.
Whereas:
It is my understanding that:
1. The only and true jurisdiction that Man can be part of is the one from his creator: Life. Life is also known as the Universe, God, the Source, Nature, Love or the Creation. Life is self aware and speaks to itself through the Heart, and;
2. The only Laws that apply to Man are the Laws of Creation also known as the Divine Laws, the Laws of Nature, the Laws of Love or the Laws of the Universe and those Laws are written into the Heart of Man, and;
3. I am a Man, and;
4. Any system of laws that are not of Life are of man, and;
5. The only jurisdiction to which I willfully and completely consent is the one from within my own Heart and I call it Love, and;
6. Out of necessity, compassion, love and to the best interest of peace for all of those who believe that only the laws of man exist and apply to all, I allow myself to be seen by systems created by man through the different interfaces that those systems provide without, nevertheless, me consenting to their jurisdiction over me, and;
7. A Man is born out of Love whereas a corporation is born out of money. It is therefore impossible for a Man to give or receive money since the only thing a Man can give or receive is Love, and;
8. All the people living on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand enjoy the protection of the common law, and;
9. Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and;
10. The law of agent and principal applies, therefore, service upon one is service upon both, and;
21. Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and;
11. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and;
13. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and;
14. For something to exist legally, it must have a name, and;
15. The Law Societies and Bar Associations of New Zealand are the ones who create the statutes and therefore they are applicable only to their members and to those that consent, and;
16. The only form of government recognized as lawful in the area commonly referred to as New Zealand is a representative one, and;
17. All governments are corporations which provide services, and;
18. All governments and corporations, including all of their agents, are bound by the Crimes Act 1961, and;
19. Representation requires mutual consent, and;
20. In the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist and;
22. Those who have an IRD (Inland Revenue Department) Number and are using it for employment are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government for its employees, and;
23. It is lawful to abandon an IRD number, and,
24. People living on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand have the right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and;
25. If anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and;
.............................................................................
Should the government be able to change existing statutory acts (force of law) regarding Claim of Right which take into consideration the lack of intention of committing an alleged crime?
What is the perspective that the News Media are giving relating to the three courageous souls who acted for the good of humanity by exposing the Spy Base that was being used as a means to harm human life. Is this "lawful excuse" for the government to change statutory acts? Are we not perhaps overlooking the fact that by doing so, the government are advocating that it is ok to support the mass destruction of human life (the more likely purpose of the spy base) while three good men defend human life based upon their beliefs and supportive actions.
In April 2010, Hon Simon Power, Minister of Justice asked the Ministry of Justice to undertake a review of the claim of right defence, used successfully by the three defendants in the Waihopai case. The review focused on whether an amendment to section 2 of the Crimes Act 1961, which defines ‘claim of right’, is required. The Ministry provided preliminary advice to the Minister on this matter in June 2010.
Review of the ‘Claim of Right’ Defence – Initial Briefing (PDF 2.41MB) Click Below.
Further advice on the reform option that fits best with New Zealand’s legislative framework will be provided to the Minister in September 2010.